NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti 16 GB vs NVIDIA RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation

VS

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti 16 GB NVIDIA RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM GeForce RTX 3070 Ti 16 GB and 12GB VRAM RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti 16 GB 's Advantages

More VRAM (16GB vs 12GB)

Larger VRAM bandwidth (608.3GB/s vs 432.0GB/s)

1024 additional rendering cores

NVIDIA RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation 's Advantages

Boost Clock has increased by 27% (2250MHz vs 1770MHz)

Lower TDP (100W vs 290W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)

GeForce RTX 3070 Ti 16 GB

21.75 TFLOPS

RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation +5%

23.04 TFLOPS

GeForce RTX 3070 Ti 16 GB

VS

RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation

Graphics Card

Unknown

Release Date

Mar 2023

GeForce 30

Generation

Quadro Ada-M

Desktop

Type

Desktop

PCIe 4.0 x16

Bus Interface

PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1575 MHz

Base Clock

1725 MHz

1770 MHz

Boost Clock

2250 MHz

1188 MHz

Memory Clock

2250 MHz

Memory

16GB

Memory Size

12GB

GDDR6X

Memory Type

GDDR6

256bit

Memory Bus

192bit

608.3GB/s

Bandwidth

432.0GB/s

Render Config

48

SM Count

40

-

Compute Units

-

6144

Shading Units

5120

192

TMUs

160

96

ROPs

64

192

Tensor Cores

160

48

RT Cores

40

128 KB (per SM)

L1 Cache

128 KB (per SM)

4 MB

L2 Cache

48 MB

Theoretical Performance

169.9 GPixel/s

Pixel Rate

144.0 GPixel/s

339.8 GTexel/s

Texture Rate

360.0 GTexel/s

21.75 TFLOPS

FP16 (half)

23.04 TFLOPS

21.75 TFLOPS

FP32 (float)

23.04 TFLOPS

339.8 GFLOPS

FP64 (double)

360.0 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GA104

GPU Name

AD104

GA104-401-A1

GPU Variant

-

Ampere

Architecture

Ada Lovelace

Samsung

Foundry

TSMC

8 nm

Process Size

5 nm

17.4 billion

Transistors

35.8 billion

392 mm²

Die Size

294 mm²

Board Design

290W

TDP

100W

600 W

Suggested PSU

300 W

1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a

Outputs

No outputs

1x 12-pin

Power Connectors

None

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)

DirectX

12 Ultimate (12_2)

4.6

OpenGL

4.6

3.0

OpenCL

3.0

1.3

Vulkan

1.3

8.6

CUDA

8.9

6.6

Shader Model

6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

1

ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti 16 GB

2

NVIDIA A100 PCIe vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti 16 GB

3

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti 16 GB

4

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti 16 GB

5

NVIDIA CMP 40HX vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti 16 GB

6

AMD Radeon RX 6800 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti 16 GB

7

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti 16 GB

8

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti 16 GB vs ATI Radeon X1600 XT Dual

9

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti 16 GB vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650

10

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti 16 GB vs AMD Radeon R7 250XE

Related News

1

Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 to Feature Frame Interpolation for GPU: A Game-Changing Experience

2

Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage

3

Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation

4

Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales

5

Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It

6

New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months

7

Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD

8

New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower

9

X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W

10

First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD