CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2
VS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 10GB VRAM GeForce RTX 3080 and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1710MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (760.3GB/s vs 111.9GB/s)
8512 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 's Advantages
Lower TDP (182W vs 320W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce RTX 3080
+6141%
29.77 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2
0.477 TFLOPS
GeForce RTX 3080
VS
GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2
Graphics Card
Sep 2020
Release Date
Jul 2008
GeForce 30
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1440 MHz
Base Clock
-
1710 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1188 MHz
Memory Clock
999 MHz
Memory
10GB
Memory Size
896MB
GDDR6X
Memory Type
GDDR3
320bit
Memory Bus
448bit
760.3GB/s
Bandwidth
111.9GB/s
Render Config
68
SM Count
24
-
Compute Units
-
8704
Shading Units
192
272
TMUs
64
96
ROPs
28
272
Tensor Cores
-
68
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
5 MB
L2 Cache
224 KB
Theoretical Performance
164.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.13 GPixel/s
465.1 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
36.86 GTexel/s
29.77 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
29.77 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
476.9 GFLOPS
465.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
59.62 GFLOPS
Graphics Processor
GA102
GPU Name
GT200B
GA102-200-KD-A1
GPU Variant
G200-103-B3
Ampere
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
55 nm
28.3 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
628 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²
Board Design
320W
TDP
182W
700 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
1x 12-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
1.3
6.6
Shader Model
4.0
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080
2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070
3
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER
4
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080
5
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 vs NVIDIA RTX A4000
6
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080
7
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB
8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 vs AMD Radeon R7 360E
9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 vs AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT
10
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 vs AMD Radeon HD 7870 GHz Edition
Related News
1
Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 to Feature Frame Interpolation for GPU: A Game-Changing Experience
2
Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage
3
Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation
4
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
5
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
6
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
7
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
8
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
9
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
10
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy