Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Max-Q vs AMD FirePro M3900

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Max-Q vs AMD FirePro M3900

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4050 Max Q and 1024MB VRAM FirePro M3900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Max-Q 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1605MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
2400 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro M3900 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 35W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce RTX 4050 Max Q +3324%
8.218 TFLOPS
FirePro M3900
0.24 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2023
Release Date
Oct 2010
GeForce 40 Mobile
Generation
FirePro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1140 MHz
Base Clock
-
1605 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
96bit
Memory Bus
64bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
14.40GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
2
20
SM Count
-
2560
Shading Units
160
80
TMUs
8
48
ROPs
4
80
Tensor Cores
-
20
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
12 MB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

77.04 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.000 GPixel/s
128.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
6.000 GTexel/s
8.218 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
8.218 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
240.0 GFLOPS
128.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

35W
TDP
20W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

AD107
GPU Name
Seymour
GN21-X2
GPU Variant
Seymour GL
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
40 nm
Unknown
Transistors
0.37 billion
146 mm²
Die Size
67 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy