Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Max-Q vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Max-Q vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4050 Max Q and 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 965M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Max-Q 's Advantages
Released 7 years late
Boost Clock has increased by 40% (1605MHz vs 1150MHz)
More VRAM (6GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
1536 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce RTX 4050 Max Q +248%
8.218 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 965M
2.355 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2023
Release Date
Jan 2016
GeForce 40 Mobile
Generation
GeForce 900M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

1140 MHz
Base Clock
935 MHz
1605 MHz
Boost Clock
1150 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
96bit
Memory Bus
128bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
80.19GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
20
SM Count
-
2560
Shading Units
1024
80
TMUs
64
48
ROPs
32
80
Tensor Cores
-
20
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
12 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

77.04 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
36.80 GPixel/s
128.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
73.60 GTexel/s
8.218 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
8.218 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.355 TFLOPS
128.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
73.60 GFLOPS

Board Design

35W
TDP
Unknown
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

AD107
GPU Name
GM206S
GN21-X2
GPU Variant
N16E-GR-A1
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
28 nm
Unknown
Transistors
2.94 billion
146 mm²
Die Size
228 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.9
CUDA
5.2
6.7
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy