Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Max-Q vs NVIDIA GeForce MX230

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Max-Q vs NVIDIA GeForce MX230

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4050 Max Q and 2GB VRAM GeForce MX230 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Max-Q 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 5% (1605MHz vs 1531MHz)
More VRAM (6GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 48.06GB/s)
2304 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce MX230 's Advantages
Lower TDP (10W vs 35W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce RTX 4050 Max Q +948%
8.218 TFLOPS
GeForce MX230
0.784 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2023
Release Date
Feb 2019
GeForce 40 Mobile
Generation
GeForce MX
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x4

Clock Speeds

1140 MHz
Base Clock
1519 MHz
1605 MHz
Boost Clock
1531 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
96bit
Memory Bus
64bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
48.06GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
20
SM Count
2
2560
Shading Units
256
80
TMUs
16
48
ROPs
16
80
Tensor Cores
-
20
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
12 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

77.04 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
24.50 GPixel/s
128.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
24.50 GTexel/s
8.218 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
12.25 GFLOPS
8.218 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
783.9 GFLOPS
128.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
24.50 GFLOPS

Board Design

35W
TDP
10W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

AD107
GPU Name
GP108
GN21-X2
GPU Variant
N17S-G0-A1
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
5 nm
Process Size
14 nm
Unknown
Transistors
1.8 billion
146 mm²
Die Size
74 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.9
CUDA
6.1
6.7
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy