Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 vs NVIDIA B200 SXM 192 GB

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 vs NVIDIA B200 SXM 192 GB

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4050 and 192GB VRAM B200 SXM 192 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 44% (2640MHz vs 1837MHz)
Lower TDP (100W vs 1000W)
NVIDIA B200 SXM 192 GB 's Advantages
More VRAM (192GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (4100GB/s vs 216.0GB/s)
14336 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce RTX 4050
13.52 TFLOPS
B200 SXM 192 GB +359%
62.08 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Jan 2024
GeForce 40
Generation
Tesla Blackwell
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16

Clock Speeds

2505 MHz
Base Clock
1665 MHz
2640 MHz
Boost Clock
1837 MHz
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
192GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
HBM3e
96bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
216.0GB/s
Bandwidth
4100GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
18
SM Count
132
2560
Shading Units
16896
80
TMUs
528
32
ROPs
24
120
Tensor Cores
528
18
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
256 KB (per SM)
32 MB
L2 Cache
50 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

84.48 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
44.09 GPixel/s
211.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
969.9 GTexel/s
13.52 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
248.3 TFLOPS
13.52 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
62.08 TFLOPS
211.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
31.04 TFLOPS

Board Design

100W
TDP
1000W
300 W
Suggested PSU
1400 W
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
1x 12-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

AD107
GPU Name
GB100
-
-
-
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Blackwell
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
5 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
208 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
9.0
6.7
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy