Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 vs AMD FirePro W2100

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 vs AMD FirePro W2100

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4050 and 2GB VRAM FirePro W2100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 288% (2640MHz vs 680MHz)
More VRAM (6GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (216.0GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
2240 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro W2100 's Advantages
Lower TDP (26W vs 100W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce RTX 4050 +3008%
13.52 TFLOPS
FirePro W2100
0.435 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Aug 2014
GeForce 40
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

2505 MHz
Base Clock
630 MHz
2640 MHz
Boost Clock
680 MHz
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
96bit
Memory Bus
128bit
216.0GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
5
18
SM Count
-
2560
Shading Units
320
80
TMUs
20
32
ROPs
8
120
Tensor Cores
-
18
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
32 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

84.48 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.440 GPixel/s
211.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
13.60 GTexel/s
13.52 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
13.52 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
435.2 GFLOPS
211.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
27.20 GFLOPS

Board Design

100W
TDP
26W
300 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 12-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

AD107
GPU Name
Oland
-
-
-
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
28 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
0.95 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
77 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy