Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4050 and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 's Advantages
Boost Clock2640MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 896GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (216.0GB/s vs 111.9GB/s)
2344 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (100W vs 182W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce RTX 4050 +2422%
13.52 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216
0.536 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Sep 2008
GeForce 40
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

2505 MHz
Base Clock
-
2640 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
999 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
896MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
96bit
Memory Bus
448bit
216.0GB/s
Bandwidth
111.9GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
18
SM Count
27
2560
Shading Units
216
80
TMUs
72
32
ROPs
28
120
Tensor Cores
-
18
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
32 MB
L2 Cache
224 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

84.48 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.13 GPixel/s
211.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.47 GTexel/s
13.52 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
13.52 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
536.5 GFLOPS
211.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
67.07 GFLOPS

Board Design

100W
TDP
182W
300 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
1x 12-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

AD107
GPU Name
GT200
-
GPU Variant
G200-103-A2
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
65 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
576 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
1.3
6.7
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy