Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB vs ATI Radeon X1650

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB vs ATI Radeon X1650

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB and 256MB VRAM Radeon X1650 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB 's Advantages
Released 15 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock2535MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
4352 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

May 2023
Release Date
Nov 2007
GeForce 40
Generation
Radeon R500 PCIe
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

2310 MHz
Base Clock
-
2535 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR2
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
288.0GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s

Render Config

34
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
4352
Shading Units
-
136
TMUs
4
48
ROPs
4
136
Tensor Cores
-
34
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
32 MB
L2 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

121.7 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.540 GPixel/s
344.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.540 GTexel/s
22.06 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
22.06 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
344.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

AD106
GPU Name
RV516
AD106-351-A1
GPU Variant
-
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Ultra-Threaded SE
TSMC
Foundry
UMC
5 nm
Process Size
90 nm
22.9 billion
Transistors
0.105 billion
188 mm²
Die Size
100 mm²

Board Design

165W
TDP
Unknown
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
4.6
OpenGL
2.1
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
3.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy