Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4060 and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock2460MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 896GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (272.0GB/s vs 111.9GB/s)
2856 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (115W vs 182W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce RTX 4060 +2719%
15.11 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216
0.536 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2023
Release Date
Sep 2008
GeForce 40
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1830 MHz
Base Clock
-
2460 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2125 MHz
Memory Clock
999 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
896MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
448bit
272.0GB/s
Bandwidth
111.9GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
24
SM Count
27
3072
Shading Units
216
96
TMUs
72
48
ROPs
28
96
Tensor Cores
-
24
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
24 MB
L2 Cache
224 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

118.1 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.13 GPixel/s
236.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.47 GTexel/s
15.11 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
15.11 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
536.5 GFLOPS
236.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
67.07 GFLOPS

Board Design

115W
TDP
182W
300 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
1x 12-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

AD107
GPU Name
GT200
AD107-400-A1
GPU Variant
G200-103-A2
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
65 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
576 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
1.3
6.7
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy