NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 AD103 vs AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT

VS

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 AD103

AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 12GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4070 AD103 and 16GB VRAM Radeon RX 6900 XT to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 AD103 's Advantages

Released 3 years and 5 months late

Boost Clock has increased by 10% (2475MHz vs 2250MHz)

768 additional rendering cores

Lower TDP (200W vs 300W)

AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT 's Advantages

More VRAM (16GB vs 12GB)

Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 504.2GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)

GeForce RTX 4070 AD103 +26%

29.15 TFLOPS

Radeon RX 6900 XT

23.04 TFLOPS

3DMark Time Spy

GeForce RTX 4070 AD103

13502

Radeon RX 6900 XT +55%

20932

GeForce RTX 4070 AD103

VS

Radeon RX 6900 XT

Graphics Card

Mar 2024

Release Date

Oct 2020

GeForce 40

Generation

Navi II

Desktop

Type

Desktop

PCIe 4.0 x16

Bus Interface

PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1920 MHz

Base Clock

1825 MHz

2475 MHz

Boost Clock

2250 MHz

1313 MHz

Memory Clock

2000 MHz

Memory

12GB

Memory Size

16GB

GDDR6X

Memory Type

GDDR6

192bit

Memory Bus

256bit

504.2GB/s

Bandwidth

512.0GB/s

Render Config

-

Compute Units

80

46

SM Count

-

5888

Shading Units

5120

184

TMUs

320

64

ROPs

128

184

Tensor Cores

-

46

RT Cores

80

128 KB (per SM)

L1 Cache

128 KB per Array

36 MB

L2 Cache

4 MB

-

L3 Cache

128 MB

Theoretical Performance

158.4 GPixel/s

Pixel Rate

288.0 GPixel/s

455.4 GTexel/s

Texture Rate

720.0 GTexel/s

29.15 TFLOPS

FP16 (half)

46.08 TFLOPS

29.15 TFLOPS

FP32 (float)

23.04 TFLOPS

455.4 GFLOPS

FP64 (double)

1440 GFLOPS

Board Design

200W

TDP

300W

550 W

Suggested PSU

700 W

1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a

Outputs

1x HDMI 2.1 2x DisplayPort 1.4a 1x USB Type-C

1x 16-pin

Power Connectors

2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

AD103

GPU Name

Navi 21

AD103-175-K1-A1

GPU Variant

Navi 21 XTX (215-121000167)

Ada Lovelace

Architecture

RDNA 2.0

TSMC

Foundry

TSMC

5 nm

Process Size

7 nm

45.9 billion

Transistors

26.8 billion

379 mm²

Die Size

520 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)

DirectX

12 Ultimate (12_2)

4.6

OpenGL

4.6

3.0

OpenCL

2.1

1.3

Vulkan

1.3

8.9

CUDA

-

6.7

Shader Model

6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

1

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 AD103 vs AMD Radeon R9 Nano

2

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 AD103 vs ATI Radeon HD 3850 X2

3

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 AD103 vs NVIDIA GeForce2 Ultra

4

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 AD103 vs ATI FireMV 2250

5

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 AD103 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050

6

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 AD103 vs ATI Radeon HD 3850 X3

7

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 AD103 vs AMD Radeon HD 6570

8

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 AD103 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 490

9

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 AD103 vs AMD FirePro S9010

10

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 AD103 vs ATI FirePro V7900

Related News

1

Complete Lineup of Core Ultra 200HX/H/U and Core 200H/U Revealed: 31 Models to Dazzle the Eyes

2

Amechi Unveils V1 Mini PC: Only 0.33L Volume with 150W Power Consumption

3

iPhone 17 Series Set for Major Design Overhaul: Camera Module Transformed into Sleek Strip

4

The Thinnest iPhone Ever! iPhone 17 Air Reportedly Enters Foxconn's NPI Stage

5

Apple Allegedly Cancels M4 Extreme, Originally Planned for Mac Pro with 64-Core CPU and 160-Core GPU

6

Cyberpunk 2077 Update 2.2: Intel Arrow Lake Gaming Performance Soars by 33%!

7

Intel Finally Achieves Frame Generation! 'F1 24' Becomes the First XeSS 2 Game

8

World's First! Intel Arc B580 Graphics Card Arrives Early

9

Linux Creator Criticizes AMD and Intel's x86 Microarchitecture: A Complete Disaster

10

Preliminary Support for Intel Nova Lake in AIDA64: Identity Remains a Mystery