NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER

VS

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 and 6GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 's Advantages

Released 4 years and 8 months late

Boost Clock has increased by 46% (2610MHz vs 1785MHz)

More VRAM (16GB vs 6GB)

Larger VRAM bandwidth (672.3GB/s vs 336.0GB/s)

7040 additional rendering cores

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER 's Advantages

Lower TDP (125W vs 285W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 +777%

44.1 TFLOPS

GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER

5.027 TFLOPS

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102

VS

GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER

Graphics Card

Jun 2024

Release Date

Oct 2019

GeForce 40

Generation

GeForce 16

Desktop

Type

Desktop

PCIe 4.0 x16

Bus Interface

PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

2340 MHz

Base Clock

1530 MHz

2610 MHz

Boost Clock

1785 MHz

1313 MHz

Memory Clock

1750 MHz

Memory

16GB

Memory Size

6GB

GDDR6X

Memory Type

GDDR6

256bit

Memory Bus

192bit

672.3GB/s

Bandwidth

336.0GB/s

Render Config

-

66

SM Count

22

8448

Shading Units

1408

264

TMUs

88

96

ROPs

48

264

Tensor Cores

-

66

RT Cores

-

128 KB (per SM)

L1 Cache

64 KB (per SM)

48 MB

L2 Cache

1536 KB

-

Theoretical Performance

250.6 GPixel/s

Pixel Rate

85.68 GPixel/s

689.0 GTexel/s

Texture Rate

157.1 GTexel/s

44.10 TFLOPS

FP16 (half)

10.05 TFLOPS

44.10 TFLOPS

FP32 (float)

5.027 TFLOPS

689.0 GFLOPS

FP64 (double)

157.1 GFLOPS

Board Design

285W

TDP

125W

600 W

Suggested PSU

300 W

1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 1.4a

Outputs

1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a

1x 16-pin

Power Connectors

1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

AD102

GPU Name

TU116

AD102-175-KEF-A1

GPU Variant

TU116-300-A1

Ada Lovelace

Architecture

Turing

TSMC

Foundry

TSMC

5 nm

Process Size

12 nm

76.3 billion

Transistors

6.6 billion

609 mm²

Die Size

284 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)

DirectX

12 (12_1)

4.6

OpenGL

4.6

3.0

OpenCL

3.0

1.3

Vulkan

1.3

8.9

CUDA

7.5

6.8

Shader Model

6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

1

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 vs AMD Radeon HD 7350 OEM

2

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 vs ATI FireGL V5600

3

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM Rebrand

4

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER

5

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 vs ATI Radeon HD 4580

6

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 vs Intel Arc A770

7

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 vs AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT

8

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 vs ATI FirePro V7900

9

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X

10

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB

Related News

1

NVIDIA Allegedly Equips RTX 5080 with 30Gbps Memory Speed, Other Models to Feature 28Gbps

2

Intel Reports High Return Rates for Devices Featuring Snapdragon X Series; Qualcomm Counters with 'Industry Standard' Claim

3

Intel Confirms Panther Lake Adopts 18A Process, ES0 Samples Already Sent to Customers

4

Complete Lineup of Core Ultra 200HX/H/U and Core 200H/U Revealed: 31 Models to Dazzle the Eyes

5

Amechi Unveils V1 Mini PC: Only 0.33L Volume with 150W Power Consumption

6

iPhone 17 Series Set for Major Design Overhaul: Camera Module Transformed into Sleek Strip

7

The Thinnest iPhone Ever! iPhone 17 Air Reportedly Enters Foxconn's NPI Stage

8

Apple Allegedly Cancels M4 Extreme, Originally Planned for Mac Pro with 64-Core CPU and 160-Core GPU

9

Cyberpunk 2077 Update 2.2: Intel Arrow Lake Gaming Performance Soars by 33%!

10

Intel Finally Achieves Frame Generation! 'F1 24' Becomes the First XeSS 2 Game