Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 vs NVIDIA NVS 310

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 vs NVIDIA NVS 310

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 and 512MB VRAM NVS 310 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 's Advantages
Released 12 years late
Boost Clock2610MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (672.3GB/s vs 14.00GB/s)
8400 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA NVS 310 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 285W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 +44000%
44.1 TFLOPS
NVS 310
0.1 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2024
Release Date
Jun 2012
GeForce 40
Generation
NVS
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

2340 MHz
Base Clock
-
2610 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1313 MHz
Memory Clock
875 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6X
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
672.3GB/s
Bandwidth
14.00GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
66
SM Count
1
8448
Shading Units
48
264
TMUs
8
96
ROPs
4
264
Tensor Cores
-
66
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
48 MB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

250.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.046 GPixel/s
689.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.184 GTexel/s
44.10 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
44.10 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
100.4 GFLOPS
689.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
8.368 GFLOPS

Board Design

285W
TDP
20W
600 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DisplayPort
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

AD102
GPU Name
GF119
AD102-175-KEF-A1
GPU Variant
GF119-825-A1
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
40 nm
76.3 billion
Transistors
0.292 billion
609 mm²
Die Size
79 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
2.1
6.8
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy