Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 vs AMD FirePro D300

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 vs AMD FirePro D300

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4080 and 2GB VRAM FirePro D300 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock2505MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (716.8GB/s vs 162.6GB/s)
8448 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro D300 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 320W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce RTX 4080 +2139%
48.74 TFLOPS
FirePro D300
2.176 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2022
Release Date
Jan 2014
GeForce 40
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

2205 MHz
Base Clock
-
2505 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1400 MHz
Memory Clock
1270 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6X
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
716.8GB/s
Bandwidth
162.6GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
20
76
SM Count
-
9728
Shading Units
1280
304
TMUs
80
112
ROPs
32
304
Tensor Cores
-
76
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
64 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

280.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
27.20 GPixel/s
761.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
68.00 GTexel/s
48.74 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
48.74 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.176 TFLOPS
761.5 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
136.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

320W
TDP
150W
700 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

AD103
GPU Name
Pitcairn
AD103-300-A1
GPU Variant
Pitcairn XT GL (215-0828073)
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
28 nm
45.9 billion
Transistors
2.8 billion
379 mm²
Die Size
212 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy