Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Ti vs ATI Radeon X1650

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Ti vs ATI Radeon X1650

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 24GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4090 Ti and 256MB VRAM Radeon X1650 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Ti 's Advantages
Boost Clock2565MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1152GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
18176 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Nov 2007
GeForce 40
Generation
Radeon R500 PCIe
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

2325 MHz
Base Clock
-
2565 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

24GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR6X
Memory Type
DDR2
384bit
Memory Bus
64bit
1152GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
142
SM Count
-
18176
Shading Units
-
568
TMUs
4
192
ROPs
4
568
Tensor Cores
-
142
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
96 MB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

492.5 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.540 GPixel/s
1457 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.540 GTexel/s
93.24 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
93.24 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
1457 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

600W
TDP
Unknown
1000 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
2x 16-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

AD102
GPU Name
RV516
AD102-400-A1
GPU Variant
-
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Ultra-Threaded SE
TSMC
Foundry
UMC
5 nm
Process Size
90 nm
76.3 billion
Transistors
0.105 billion
609 mm²
Die Size
100 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
4.6
OpenGL
2.1
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
3.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy