Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 vs AMD FirePro W600

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 vs AMD FirePro W600

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 24GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4090 and 2GB VRAM FirePro W600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock2520MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1.01TB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
15872 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro W600 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 450W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce RTX 4090 +10652%
82.58 TFLOPS
FirePro W600
0.768 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2022
Release Date
Jun 2012
GeForce 40
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

2235 MHz
Base Clock
-
2520 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1313 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

24GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6X
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
1.01TB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
8
128
SM Count
-
16384
Shading Units
512
512
TMUs
32
176
ROPs
16
512
Tensor Cores
-
128
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
72 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

443.5 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.00 GPixel/s
1290 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
24.00 GTexel/s
82.58 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
82.58 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
768.0 GFLOPS
1290 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
48.00 GFLOPS

Board Design

450W
TDP
75W
850 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

AD102
GPU Name
Cape Verde
AD102-300-A1
GPU Variant
Cape Verde PRO GL
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
28 nm
76.3 billion
Transistors
1.5 billion
609 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
8.9
CUDA
-
6.8
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy