Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 vs ATI Radeon X1650 GT

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 vs ATI Radeon X1650 GT

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 24GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4090 and 128MB VRAM Radeon X1650 GT to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 's Advantages
Released 15 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock2520MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1010GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
16384 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2022
Release Date
May 2007
GeForce 40
Generation
Radeon R500 PCIe
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

2235 MHz
Base Clock
-
2520 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1313 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

24GB
Memory Size
128MB
GDDR6X
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
1010GB/s
Bandwidth
12.80GB/s

Render Config

128
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
16384
Shading Units
-
512
TMUs
8
176
ROPs
8
512
Tensor Cores
-
128
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
72 MB
L2 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

443.5 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.200 GPixel/s
1290 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
3.200 GTexel/s
82.58 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
82.58 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
1290 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

AD102
GPU Name
RV560
AD102-300-A1
GPU Variant
RV560 GT
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Ultra-Threaded SE
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
80 nm
76.3 billion
Transistors
0.312 billion
609 mm²
Die Size
230 mm²

Board Design

450W
TDP
Unknown
850 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
4.6
OpenGL
2.1
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
3.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy