Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 vs ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 vs ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 32GB VRAM GeForce RTX 5090 and 256MB VRAM FirePro 2450 Multi View to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 's Advantages
Released 16 years late
Boost Clock2520MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1.52TB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
21720 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 500W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce RTX 5090 +342712%
109.7 TFLOPS
FirePro 2450 Multi View
0.032 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2025
Release Date
Jan 2009
GeForce 50
Generation
FirePro Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

2235 MHz
Base Clock
-
2520 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1875 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

32GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR7
Memory Type
DDR3
512bit
Memory Bus
64bit
1.52TB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
2
170
SM Count
-
21760
Shading Units
40
680
TMUs
4
192
ROPs
4
680
Tensor Cores
-
170
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
88 MB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

483.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.600 GPixel/s
1714 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1.600 GTexel/s
109.7 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
109.7 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
32.00 GFLOPS
1.714 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

500W
TDP
32W
900 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 2.1a
Outputs
1x VHDCI
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GB202
GPU Name
RV620
GB202-400-A1
GPU Variant
RV620 PRO (215-0670006)
Blackwell 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
4 nm
Process Size
55 nm
Unknown
Transistors
0.181 billion
Unknown
Die Size
67 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
10.1
CUDA
-
6.8
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy