Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GRID A100B vs NVIDIA Quadro M2200 Mobile

NVIDIA GRID A100B vs NVIDIA Quadro M2200 Mobile

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 48GB VRAM GRID A100B and 4GB VRAM Quadro M2200 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GRID A100B 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 4 months late
More VRAM (48GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1866GB/s vs 88.13GB/s)
5888 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro M2200 Mobile 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 3% (1036MHz vs 1005MHz)
Lower TDP (55W vs 400W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GRID A100B +554%
13.89 TFLOPS
Quadro M2200 Mobile
2.122 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2020
Release Date
Jan 2017
GRID
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

900 MHz
Base Clock
695 MHz
1005 MHz
Boost Clock
1036 MHz
1215 MHz
Memory Clock
1377 MHz

Memory

48GB
Memory Size
4GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR5
6144bit
Memory Bus
128bit
1866GB/s
Bandwidth
88.13GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
108
SM Count
-
6912
Shading Units
1024
432
TMUs
64
192
ROPs
32
432
Tensor Cores
-
-
-
-
192 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
48 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

193.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
33.15 GPixel/s
434.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
66.30 GTexel/s
55.57 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
13.89 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.122 TFLOPS
6.947 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
66.30 GFLOPS

Board Design

400W
TDP
55W
800 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GA100
GPU Name
GM206
-
-
-
Ampere
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
28 nm
54.2 billion
Transistors
2.94 billion
826 mm²
Die Size
228 mm²

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
12 (12_1)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
8.0
CUDA
5.2
N/A
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy