Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GRID A100B vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M

NVIDIA GRID A100B vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 48GB VRAM GRID A100B and 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 160M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GRID A100B 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1005MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1866GB/s vs 11.20GB/s)
6904 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (12W vs 400W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GRID A100B +60291%
13.89 TFLOPS
Quadro NVS 160M
0.023 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2020
Release Date
Aug 2008
GRID
Generation
NVS Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-I

Clock Speeds

900 MHz
Base Clock
-
1005 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1215 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz

Memory

48GB
Memory Size
256MB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR3
6144bit
Memory Bus
64bit
1866GB/s
Bandwidth
11.20GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
108
SM Count
1
6912
Shading Units
8
432
TMUs
4
192
ROPs
4
432
Tensor Cores
-
-
-
-
192 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
48 MB
L2 Cache
16 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

193.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.320 GPixel/s
434.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.320 GTexel/s
55.57 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
13.89 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
23.20 GFLOPS
6.947 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

400W
TDP
12W
800 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GA100
GPU Name
G98
-
GPU Variant
NB9M-GS
Ampere
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
65 nm
54.2 billion
Transistors
0.21 billion
826 mm²
Die Size
86 mm²

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
N/A
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
8.0
CUDA
1.1
N/A
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy