Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GRID K1 vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000

NVIDIA GRID K1 vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM GRID K1 and 16GB VRAM Quadro RTX 5000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GRID K1 's Advantages
Lower TDP (130W vs 230W)
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1815MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 28.51GB/s)
2880 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GRID K1
0.326 TFLOPS
Quadro RTX 5000 +3320%
11.15 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2013
Release Date
Aug 2018
GRID
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1620 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1815 MHz
891 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
16GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
28.51GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
48
192
Shading Units
3072
16
TMUs
192
16
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
384
-
RT Cores
48
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

3.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
116.2 GPixel/s
13.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
348.5 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
22.30 TFLOPS
326.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
11.15 TFLOPS
13.60 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
348.5 GFLOPS

Board Design

130W
TDP
230W
300 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a 1x USB Type-C
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GK107
GPU Name
TU104
GK107-450-A2
GPU Variant
TU104-875-A1
Kepler
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
13.6 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
545 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
7.5
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy