CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA GRID K100 vs Intel Data Center GPU Max Subsystem
NVIDIA GRID K100 vs Intel Data Center GPU Max Subsystem
VS
NVIDIA GRID K100
Intel Data Center GPU Max Subsystem
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 256MB VRAM GRID K100 and 128GB VRAM Data Center GPU Max Subsystem to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GRID K100 's Advantages
Lower TDP (130W vs 2400W)
Intel Data Center GPU Max Subsystem 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1600MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (3205GB/s vs 28.51GB/s)
16192 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GRID K100
0.326 TFLOPS
Data Center GPU Max Subsystem
+15982%
52.43 TFLOPS
GRID K100
VS
Data Center GPU Max Subsystem
Graphics Card
Jun 2013
Release Date
Jan 2023
GRID
Generation
Data Center GPU
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
900 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1600 MHz
891 MHz
Memory Clock
1565 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
128GB
DDR3
Memory Type
HBM2e
128bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
28.51GB/s
Bandwidth
3205GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
192
Shading Units
16384
16
TMUs
1024
16
ROPs
0
-
Tensor Cores
1024
-
RT Cores
128
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per EU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
408 MB
Theoretical Performance
3.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
13.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1638 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
52.43 TFLOPS
326.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
52.43 TFLOPS
13.60 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
52.43 TFLOPS
Graphics Processor
GK107
GPU Name
Ponte Vecchio
-
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Generation 12.5
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
28 nm
Process Size
10 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
100 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
1280 mm²
Board Design
130W
TDP
2400W
300 W
Suggested PSU
2800 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.6
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA GRID K100 vs NVIDIA GRID K1
2
NVIDIA Quadro K2200 vs NVIDIA GRID K100
3
NVIDIA GRID K100 vs NVIDIA Quadro K3000M
4
NVIDIA Quadro P620 vs NVIDIA GRID K100
5
NVIDIA Quadro P3000 Mobile vs NVIDIA GRID K100
6
NVIDIA RTX A500 Embedded vs NVIDIA GRID K100
7
NVIDIA Quadro M5500 Mobile vs NVIDIA GRID K100
8
NVIDIA GRID K100 vs NVIDIA Tesla K10
9
NVIDIA GRID K100 vs NVIDIA Tesla P100 SXM2
10
NVIDIA GRID K100 vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile
Related News
1
AMD Ryzen 9000 Series Now Available for Pre-order in Europe: 9950X Priced at €660, Shipping by August 2
2
AMD's Latest Breakthrough Technology Could Change the Game in the Future
3
Researchers Utilize NVIDIA Omniverse Platform to Analyze and Improve 3D Stacked Chip Designs
4
TSMC to Receive Over 60 EUV Lithography Machines Over the Next Two Years, Investing More Than $12.3 Billion
5
Samsung's Own 3nm Yield is Disheartening: Galaxy S25 May Introduce MediaTek for the First Time
6
AMD Ryzen 9000 DDR5 Memory Frequency Soars: Reaches 8000MHz with All Four Slots Occupied
7
Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 to Feature Frame Interpolation for GPU: A Game-Changing Experience
8
Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage
9
Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation
10
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy