Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GRID K160Q vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI25

NVIDIA GRID K160Q vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI25

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GRID K160Q and 16GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI25 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GRID K160Q 's Advantages
Lower TDP (130W vs 300W)
AMD Radeon Instinct MI25 's Advantages
Released 4 years late
Boost Clock1500MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (436.2GB/s vs 28.51GB/s)
3904 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GRID K160Q
0.326 TFLOPS
Radeon Instinct MI25 +3669%
12.29 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2013
Release Date
Jun 2017
GRID
Generation
Radeon Instinct
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1400 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1500 MHz
891 MHz
Memory Clock
852 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
16GB
DDR3
Memory Type
HBM2
128bit
Memory Bus
2048bit
28.51GB/s
Bandwidth
436.2GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
64
192
Shading Units
4096
16
TMUs
256
16
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB

Theoretical Performance

3.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
96.00 GPixel/s
13.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
384.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
24.58 TFLOPS
326.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.29 TFLOPS
13.60 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
768.0 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GK107
GPU Name
Vega 10
-
GPU Variant
Vega 10 XT GL (215-0894124)
Kepler
Architecture
GCN 5.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
28 nm
Process Size
14 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
12.5 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
495 mm²

Board Design

130W
TDP
300W
300 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.1
Vulkan
1.2
3.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy