Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GRID K160Q vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M

NVIDIA GRID K160Q vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GRID K160Q and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1700M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GRID K160Q 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 8 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (28.51GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
160 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 130W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GRID K160Q +229%
0.326 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 1700M
0.099 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2013
Release Date
Oct 2008
GRID
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-II

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
891 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
512MB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
28.51GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
4
192
Shading Units
32
16
TMUs
16
16
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

3.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.000 GPixel/s
13.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
10.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
326.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
99.20 GFLOPS
13.60 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

130W
TDP
50W
300 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-

Graphics Processor

GK107
GPU Name
G96
-
GPU Variant
NB9P-GLM
Kepler
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
UMC
28 nm
Process Size
65 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
0.314 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
144 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
1.1
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy