NVIDIA GRID K200 vs NVIDIA Quadro 3000M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 256MB VRAM GRID K200 and 2GB VRAM Quadro 3000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GRID K200 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 4 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 80.00GB/s)
1296 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro 3000M 's Advantages
More VRAM (2GB vs 256GB)
Lower TDP (75W vs 225W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GRID K200
+429%
2.289 TFLOPS
Quadro 3000M
0.432 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2013
Release Date
Feb 2011
GRID
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
625 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
80.00GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
5
1536
Shading Units
240
128
TMUs
40
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
23.84 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.500 GPixel/s
95.36 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
18.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.289 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
432.0 GFLOPS
95.36 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
36.00 GFLOPS
Board Design
225W
TDP
75W
550 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-
Graphics Processor
GK104
GPU Name
GF104
-
GPU Variant
N12E-Q1-A1
Kepler
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
1.95 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
332 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
2.1
5.1
Shader Model
5.1
