Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GRID K200 vs NVIDIA Quadro 410

NVIDIA GRID K200 vs NVIDIA Quadro 410

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 256MB VRAM GRID K200 and 512MB VRAM Quadro 410 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GRID K200 's Advantages
Released 10 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 14.26GB/s)
1344 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro 410 's Advantages
More VRAM (512GB vs 256GB)
Lower TDP (38W vs 225W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GRID K200 +744%
2.289 TFLOPS
Quadro 410
0.271 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2013
Release Date
Aug 2012
GRID
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
891 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
14.26GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
-
-
1536
Shading Units
192
128
TMUs
16
32
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
512 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

23.84 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.824 GPixel/s
95.36 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
11.30 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.289 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
271.1 GFLOPS
95.36 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
11.30 GFLOPS

Board Design

225W
TDP
38W
550 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.2
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
GK107
-
GPU Variant
GK107-810-A2
Kepler
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.1
3.0
CUDA
3.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy