NVIDIA GRID K200 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 256MB VRAM GRID K200 and 768MB VRAM Quadro FX 4600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GRID K200 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 3 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 67.20GB/s)
1440 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600 's Advantages
More VRAM (768GB vs 256GB)
Lower TDP (134W vs 225W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GRID K200
+895%
2.289 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 4600
0.23 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2013
Release Date
Mar 2007
GRID
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
768MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
67.20GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
12
1536
Shading Units
96
128
TMUs
24
32
ROPs
24
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
96 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
23.84 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.00 GPixel/s
95.36 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
24.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.289 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
230.4 GFLOPS
95.36 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
225W
TDP
134W
550 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI
1x S-Video
-
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
GK104
GPU Name
G80
-
GPU Variant
G80-850-A2
Kepler
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
90 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
0.681 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
484 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1 (1.0)
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
1.0
5.1
Shader Model
4.0
