NVIDIA GRID K200 vs NVIDIA Quadro P2200
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 256MB VRAM GRID K200 and 5GB VRAM Quadro P2200 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GRID K200 's Advantages
256 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro P2200 's Advantages
Released 6 years late
Boost Clock1493MHz
More VRAM (5GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (200.2GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
Lower TDP (75W vs 225W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GRID K200
2.289 TFLOPS
Quadro P2200
+66%
3.822 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2013
Release Date
Jun 2019
GRID
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1493 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1251 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
5GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5X
256bit
Memory Bus
160bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
200.2GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
10
1536
Shading Units
1280
128
TMUs
80
32
ROPs
40
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
1280 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
23.84 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
59.72 GPixel/s
95.36 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
119.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
59.72 GFLOPS
2.289 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.822 TFLOPS
95.36 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
119.4 GFLOPS
Board Design
225W
TDP
75W
550 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GK104
GPU Name
GP106
-
-
-
Kepler
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
16 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
4.4 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
6.1
5.1
Shader Model
6.4
