CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA GRID K200 vs NVIDIA Quadro P6000
NVIDIA GRID K200 vs NVIDIA Quadro P6000
VS
NVIDIA GRID K200
NVIDIA Quadro P6000
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 256MB VRAM GRID K200 and 24GB VRAM Quadro P6000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GRID K200 's Advantages
Lower TDP (225W vs 250W)
NVIDIA Quadro P6000 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1645MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (432.8GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
2304 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GRID K200
2.289 TFLOPS
Quadro P6000
+451%
12.63 TFLOPS
GRID K200
VS
Quadro P6000
Graphics Card
Jun 2013
Release Date
Oct 2016
GRID
Generation
Quadro Pascal
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1506 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1645 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1127 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
24GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5X
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
432.8GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
30
1536
Shading Units
3840
128
TMUs
240
32
ROPs
96
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
3 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
23.84 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
157.9 GPixel/s
95.36 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
394.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
197.4 GFLOPS
2.289 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.63 TFLOPS
95.36 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
394.8 GFLOPS
Board Design
225W
TDP
250W
550 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 4x DisplayPort 1.4a
-
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GK104
GPU Name
GP102
-
GPU Variant
GP102-875-A1
Kepler
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
16 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
11.8 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
471 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
6.1
5.1
Shader Model
6.7
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA GRID K200 vs NVIDIA Quadro P3000 Mobile
2
NVIDIA GRID K200 vs NVIDIA GRID K1
3
NVIDIA GRID K200 vs NVIDIA Tesla K20s
4
NVIDIA GRID K200 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition
5
NVIDIA GRID K200 vs NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 4
6
NVIDIA GRID K200 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 5600 Mac Edition
7
NVIDIA GRID K200 vs NVIDIA Quadro 4000
8
NVIDIA GRID K200 vs NVIDIA L40S
9
NVIDIA GRID K200 vs NVIDIA RTX A500 Mobile
10
NVIDIA GRID K200 vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI300
Related News
1
NVIDIA Allegedly Equips RTX 5080 with 30Gbps Memory Speed, Other Models to Feature 28Gbps
2
Intel Reports High Return Rates for Devices Featuring Snapdragon X Series; Qualcomm Counters with 'Industry Standard' Claim
3
Intel Confirms Panther Lake Adopts 18A Process, ES0 Samples Already Sent to Customers
4
Complete Lineup of Core Ultra 200HX/H/U and Core 200H/U Revealed: 31 Models to Dazzle the Eyes
5
Amechi Unveils V1 Mini PC: Only 0.33L Volume with 150W Power Consumption
6
iPhone 17 Series Set for Major Design Overhaul: Camera Module Transformed into Sleek Strip
7
The Thinnest iPhone Ever! iPhone 17 Air Reportedly Enters Foxconn's NPI Stage
8
Apple Allegedly Cancels M4 Extreme, Originally Planned for Mac Pro with 64-Core CPU and 160-Core GPU
9
Cyberpunk 2077 Update 2.2: Intel Arrow Lake Gaming Performance Soars by 33%!
10
Intel Finally Achieves Frame Generation! 'F1 24' Becomes the First XeSS 2 Game
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy