Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GRID K200 vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000

NVIDIA GRID K200 vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 256MB VRAM GRID K200 and 24GB VRAM Quadro RTX 6000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GRID K200 's Advantages
Lower TDP (225W vs 260W)
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1770MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (672.0GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
3072 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GRID K200
2.289 TFLOPS
Quadro RTX 6000 +612%
16.31 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2013
Release Date
Aug 2018
GRID
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1440 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1770 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
24GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
672.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
72
1536
Shading Units
4608
128
TMUs
288
32
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
576
-
RT Cores
72
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

23.84 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
169.9 GPixel/s
95.36 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
509.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
32.62 TFLOPS
2.289 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
16.31 TFLOPS
95.36 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
509.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

225W
TDP
260W
550 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a 1x USB Type-C
-
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
TU102
-
GPU Variant
TU102-875-A1
Kepler
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
18.6 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
754 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
7.5
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy