Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GRID K200 vs NVIDIA Quadro VX 200

NVIDIA GRID K200 vs NVIDIA Quadro VX 200

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 256MB VRAM GRID K200 and 512MB VRAM Quadro VX 200 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GRID K200 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 5 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
1424 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro VX 200 's Advantages
More VRAM (512GB vs 256GB)
Lower TDP (75W vs 225W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GRID K200 +808%
2.289 TFLOPS
Quadro VX 200
0.252 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2013
Release Date
Jan 2008
GRID
Generation
Quadro VX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
51.20GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
14
1536
Shading Units
112
128
TMUs
56
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

23.84 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.200 GPixel/s
95.36 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
25.20 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.289 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
252.0 GFLOPS
95.36 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

225W
TDP
75W
550 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
-
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
G92
-
-
-
Kepler
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
65 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
324 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
1.1
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy