Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GRID K200 vs NVIDIA Tesla S2050

NVIDIA GRID K200 vs NVIDIA Tesla S2050

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 256MB VRAM GRID K200 and 3GB VRAM Tesla S2050 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GRID K200 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 11 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 148.4GB/s)
1088 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (225W vs 900W)
NVIDIA Tesla S2050 's Advantages
More VRAM (3GB vs 256GB)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GRID K200 +122%
2.289 TFLOPS
Tesla S2050
1.028 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2013
Release Date
Jul 2011
GRID
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
773 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
148.4GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
14
1536
Shading Units
448
128
TMUs
56
32
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

23.84 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.07 GPixel/s
95.36 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
32.14 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.289 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1028 GFLOPS
95.36 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
513.9 GFLOPS

Board Design

225W
TDP
900W
550 W
Suggested PSU
1300 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
GF100
-
-
-
Kepler
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
3.1 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
2.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy