CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA GRID K200 vs NVIDIA Tesla V100 PCIe 32 GB
NVIDIA GRID K200 vs NVIDIA Tesla V100 PCIe 32 GB
VS
NVIDIA GRID K200
NVIDIA Tesla V100 PCIe 32 GB
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 256MB VRAM GRID K200 and 32GB VRAM Tesla V100 PCIe 32 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GRID K200 's Advantages
Lower TDP (225W vs 250W)
NVIDIA Tesla V100 PCIe 32 GB 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1380MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (897.0GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
3584 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GRID K200
2.289 TFLOPS
Tesla V100 PCIe 32 GB
+517%
14.13 TFLOPS
GRID K200
VS
Tesla V100 PCIe 32 GB
Graphics Card
Jun 2013
Release Date
Mar 2018
GRID
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1230 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1380 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
876 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
32GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2
256bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
897.0GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
80
-
Compute Units
-
1536
Shading Units
5120
128
TMUs
320
32
ROPs
128
-
Tensor Cores
640
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
Theoretical Performance
23.84 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
176.6 GPixel/s
95.36 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
441.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
28.26 TFLOPS
2.289 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
14.13 TFLOPS
95.36 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
7.066 TFLOPS
Graphics Processor
GK104
GPU Name
GV100
-
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Volta
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
21.1 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
815 mm²
Board Design
225W
TDP
250W
550 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
7.0
5.1
Shader Model
6.6
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA Quadro P3000 Mobile vs NVIDIA GRID K200
2
NVIDIA GRID K200 vs NVIDIA Quadro K3100M
3
NVIDIA Quadro K1200 vs NVIDIA GRID K200
4
NVIDIA RTX A6000 vs NVIDIA GRID K200
5
Intel Arctic Sound 1T vs NVIDIA GRID K200
6
NVIDIA GRID K520Q vs NVIDIA GRID K200
7
NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM3 32 GB vs NVIDIA GRID K200
8
NVIDIA GRID K200 vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max Q
9
NVIDIA GRID K200 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 380
10
NVIDIA GRID K200 vs NVIDIA Tesla PG500 216
Related News
1
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
2
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
3
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
4
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
5
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
6
NVIDIA Grace CPU Benchmark Results Released, Stunning Performance
7
Minisforum Launches UM890 Pro Mini PC with R9 8945HS and Dual USB4 Ports
8
Does the Apple A18 Neural Engine Boast Superior Performance? Computational Power May Surpass M4 Chip
9
AMD's Commitment to Pioneering Each Generation with Cutting-Edge Process Technology and Continuous Innovation in Design, Packaging, and Assembly
10
NVIDIA to Ramp Up Orders and Add New Suppliers to Meet Explosive Demand for Blackwell Products
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy