CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA GRID K240Q vs AMD Radeon PRO W7900
NVIDIA GRID K240Q vs AMD Radeon PRO W7900
VS
NVIDIA GRID K240Q
AMD Radeon PRO W7900
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GRID K240Q and 48GB VRAM Radeon PRO W7900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GRID K240Q 's Advantages
Lower TDP (225W vs 295W)
AMD Radeon PRO W7900 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock2495MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (864.0GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
4608 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GRID K240Q
2.289 TFLOPS
Radeon PRO W7900
+2578%
61.32 TFLOPS
GRID K240Q
VS
Radeon PRO W7900
Graphics Card
Jun 2013
Release Date
Apr 2023
GRID
Generation
Radeon Pro Navi
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1855 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2495 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
48GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
864.0GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
96
1536
Shading Units
6144
128
TMUs
384
32
ROPs
192
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
96
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
256 KB per Array
512 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
Theoretical Performance
23.84 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
479.0 GPixel/s
95.36 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
958.1 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
122.6 TFLOPS
2.289 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
61.32 TFLOPS
95.36 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1.916 TFLOPS
Graphics Processor
GK104
GPU Name
Navi 31
-
GPU Variant
Navi 31
Kepler
Architecture
RDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
5 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
57.7 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²
Board Design
225W
TDP
295W
550 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
3x DisplayPort 2.1 1x mini-DisplayPort 2.1
-
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.2
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.7
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA Quadro K620 vs NVIDIA GRID K240Q
2
NVIDIA Tesla P40 vs NVIDIA GRID K240Q
3
NVIDIA Tesla C2075 vs NVIDIA GRID K240Q
4
NVIDIA Quadro 400 vs NVIDIA GRID K240Q
5
NVIDIA Tesla PG500 216 vs NVIDIA GRID K240Q
6
NVIDIA Tesla M40 vs NVIDIA GRID K240Q
7
NVIDIA Tesla K20c vs NVIDIA GRID K240Q
8
NVIDIA GRID K240Q vs NVIDIA Quadro P3000 Mobile
9
NVIDIA GRID K240Q vs NVIDIA Tesla M10
10
NVIDIA GRID K240Q vs NVIDIA RTX A1000 Embedded
Related News
1
Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 to Feature Frame Interpolation for GPU: A Game-Changing Experience
2
Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage
3
Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation
4
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
5
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
6
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
7
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
8
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
9
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
10
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy