CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA GRID K260Q vs AMD Instinct MI300X
NVIDIA GRID K260Q vs AMD Instinct MI300X
VS
NVIDIA GRID K260Q
AMD Instinct MI300X
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM GRID K260Q and 192GB VRAM AMD Instinct MI300X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GRID K260Q 's Advantages
Lower TDP (225W vs 750W)
AMD Instinct MI300X 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock2100MHz
More VRAM (192GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (5300GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
17920 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GRID K260Q
2.289 TFLOPS
AMD Instinct MI300X
+7038%
163.4 TFLOPS
GRID K260Q
VS
AMD Instinct MI300X
Graphics Card
Jun 2013
Release Date
Dec 2023
GRID
Generation
Instinct
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2100 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
5200 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
192GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM3
256bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
5300GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
304
-
-
-
1536
Shading Units
19456
128
TMUs
880
32
ROPs
0
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
23.84 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
95.36 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1496 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
1300 TFLOPS
2.289 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
163.4 TFLOPS
95.36 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
81.7 TFLOPS
Board Design
225W
TDP
750W
550 W
Suggested PSU
1000 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GK104
GPU Name
MI300
-
-
-
Kepler
Architecture
CDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
5 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
146 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
1017 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
N/A
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA GRID K260Q vs NVIDIA Quadro M1200 Mobile
2
NVIDIA GRID K260Q vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700
3
NVIDIA GRID K260Q vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 360M
4
NVIDIA GRID K260Q vs NVIDIA Tesla M40 24 GB
5
NVIDIA GRID K260Q vs NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 16 GB
6
NVIDIA GRID K260Q vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI100
7
NVIDIA GRID K260Q vs NVIDIA Tesla K40m
8
NVIDIA GRID K260Q vs NVIDIA Tesla S870
9
NVIDIA GRID K260Q vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800M
10
NVIDIA GRID K260Q vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI60
Related News
1
AMD's Thunderous Strike: Ryzen 9 9950X3D Performance Scores Revealed for the First Time!
2
Continuous Decline in DRAM Memory Prices: Downward Trend Intensifies
3
NVIDIA GB202 Chip Unveiled for the First Time, to be Used in RTX 5090 with 512-bit GDDR7 Memory
4
Strix Halo Integrated Graphics Score Appears on Passmark, Currently Slightly Below RTX 3060 12GB
5
AMD Unveils New RX 9070 XT Graphics Card Performance: Positioned Between RX 7900 GRE and RX 7900 XT
6
Double the Excitement! AMD FSR 4.0 to Launch Alongside RX 9070 XT Graphics Card
7
CPU-Z Minor Update: Support for Intel's Four New Products and New Memory
8
CXMT Reportedly Achieves 80% Yield in DDR5 Production
9
Intel Wildcat Lake Appears on Shipping List with FCBGA1516 Socket, Poised to Replace Alder Lake-N
10
The Commencement of ARM and Qualcomm Licensing Dispute Trial: Potential Major Impact on PC Market
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy