NVIDIA GRID K260Q vs NVIDIA GRID M10 8Q
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM GRID K260Q and 8GB VRAM GRID M10 8Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GRID K260Q 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 83.20GB/s)
896 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GRID M10 8Q 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1306MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GRID K260Q
+36%
2.289 TFLOPS
GRID M10 8Q
1.672 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2013
Release Date
May 2016
GRID
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1033 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1306 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1300 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
83.20GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
1536
Shading Units
640
128
TMUs
40
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
23.84 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
20.90 GPixel/s
95.36 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
52.24 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.289 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.672 TFLOPS
95.36 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
52.24 GFLOPS
Board Design
225W
TDP
225W
550 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GK104
GPU Name
GM107
-
GPU Variant
GM107-570-A2
Kepler
Architecture
Maxwell
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
1.87 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
148 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
5.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1
