Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GRID K260Q vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 380

NVIDIA GRID K260Q vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 380

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM GRID K260Q and 256MB VRAM Quadro FX 380 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GRID K260Q 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 3 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 22.40GB/s)
1520 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 's Advantages
Lower TDP (34W vs 225W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GRID K260Q +6440%
2.289 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 380
0.035 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2013
Release Date
Mar 2009
GRID
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
22.40GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
2
-
Compute Units
-
1536
Shading Units
16
128
TMUs
8
32
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB

Theoretical Performance

23.84 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.600 GPixel/s
95.36 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
3.600 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
2.289 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
35.20 GFLOPS
95.36 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
G96
-
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
UMC
28 nm
Process Size
65 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
0.314 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
144 mm²

Board Design

225W
TDP
34W
550 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
1.1
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy