CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA GRID K260Q vs NVIDIA RTX A2000
NVIDIA GRID K260Q vs NVIDIA RTX A2000
VS
NVIDIA GRID K260Q
NVIDIA RTX A2000
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM GRID K260Q and 6GB VRAM RTX A2000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A2000 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1200MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
1792 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (70W vs 225W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GRID K260Q
2.289 TFLOPS
RTX A2000
+248%
7.987 TFLOPS
GRID K260Q
VS
RTX A2000
Graphics Card
Jun 2013
Release Date
Aug 2021
GRID
Generation
Quadro Ampere
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
562 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1200 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
192bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
288.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
26
1536
Shading Units
3328
128
TMUs
104
32
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
104
-
RT Cores
26
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
3 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
23.84 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
57.60 GPixel/s
95.36 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
124.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
7.987 TFLOPS
2.289 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.987 TFLOPS
95.36 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
124.8 GFLOPS
Board Design
225W
TDP
70W
550 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GK104
GPU Name
GA106
-
GPU Variant
GA106-850-A1
Kepler
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
8 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
12 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
276 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
8.6
5.1
Shader Model
6.7
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA GRID K260Q vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 370M
2
NVIDIA GRID K260Q vs NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB
3
NVIDIA GRID K260Q vs NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 4
4
NVIDIA GRID K260Q vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 Passive
5
NVIDIA GRID K260Q vs NVIDIA Tesla T10
6
NVIDIA GRID K260Q vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 5600 Mac Edition
7
NVIDIA GRID K260Q vs NVIDIA Quadro P4200 Mobile
8
NVIDIA GRID K260Q vs NVIDIA RTX A4500
9
NVIDIA GRID K260Q vs NVIDIA GRID K280Q
10
NVIDIA GRID K260Q vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 Mobile
Related News
1
AMD Unveils New RX 9070 XT Graphics Card Performance: Positioned Between RX 7900 GRE and RX 7900 XT
2
Double the Excitement! AMD FSR 4.0 to Launch Alongside RX 9070 XT Graphics Card
3
CPU-Z Minor Update: Support for Intel's Four New Products and New Memory
4
CXMT Reportedly Achieves 80% Yield in DDR5 Production
5
Intel Wildcat Lake Appears on Shipping List with FCBGA1516 Socket, Poised to Replace Alder Lake-N
6
The Commencement of ARM and Qualcomm Licensing Dispute Trial: Potential Major Impact on PC Market
7
NVIDIA Allegedly Equips RTX 5080 with 30Gbps Memory Speed, Other Models to Feature 28Gbps
8
Intel Reports High Return Rates for Devices Featuring Snapdragon X Series; Qualcomm Counters with 'Industry Standard' Claim
9
Intel Confirms Panther Lake Adopts 18A Process, ES0 Samples Already Sent to Customers
10
Complete Lineup of Core Ultra 200HX/H/U and Core 200H/U Revealed: 31 Models to Dazzle the Eyes
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy