Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GRID K260Q vs NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation

NVIDIA GRID K260Q vs NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM GRID K260Q and 20GB VRAM RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1560MHz
More VRAM (20GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (280.0GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
4608 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (70W vs 225W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GRID K260Q
2.289 TFLOPS
RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation +737%
19.17 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2013
Release Date
Mar 2023
GRID
Generation
Quadro Ada
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
720 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1560 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
20GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
160bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
280.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
48
1536
Shading Units
6144
128
TMUs
192
32
ROPs
80
-
Tensor Cores
192
-
RT Cores
48
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
48 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

23.84 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
124.8 GPixel/s
95.36 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
299.5 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
19.17 TFLOPS
2.289 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
19.17 TFLOPS
95.36 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
299.5 GFLOPS

Board Design

225W
TDP
70W
550 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
AD104
-
-
-
Kepler
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
5 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
35.8 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
8.9
5.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy