CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA GRID K260Q vs NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 16 GB
NVIDIA GRID K260Q vs NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 16 GB
VS
NVIDIA GRID K260Q
NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 16 GB
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM GRID K260Q and 16GB VRAM Tesla P100 PCIe 16 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GRID K260Q 's Advantages
Lower TDP (225W vs 250W)
NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 16 GB 's Advantages
Released 3 years late
Boost Clock1329MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (732.2GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
2048 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GRID K260Q
2.289 TFLOPS
Tesla P100 PCIe 16 GB
+316%
9.526 TFLOPS
GRID K260Q
VS
Tesla P100 PCIe 16 GB
Graphics Card
Jun 2013
Release Date
Jun 2016
GRID
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1190 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1329 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
715 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2
256bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
732.2GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
56
-
Compute Units
-
1536
Shading Units
3584
128
TMUs
224
32
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
24 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
Theoretical Performance
23.84 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
127.6 GPixel/s
95.36 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
297.7 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
19.05 TFLOPS
2.289 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
9.526 TFLOPS
95.36 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
4.763 TFLOPS
Graphics Processor
GK104
GPU Name
GP100
-
GPU Variant
GP100-893-A1
Kepler
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
16 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
15.3 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
610 mm²
Board Design
225W
TDP
250W
550 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
6.0
5.1
Shader Model
6.4
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA GRID K260Q vs NVIDIA Quadro CX
2
NVIDIA GRID K260Q vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M
3
NVIDIA GRID K260Q vs NVIDIA Tesla C2075
4
NVIDIA GRID K260Q vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 4700 X2
5
NVIDIA GRID K260Q vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI300
6
NVIDIA GRID K260Q vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M
7
NVIDIA GRID K260Q vs Intel Data Center GPU Flex 140
8
NVIDIA GRID K260Q vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600 SDI
9
NVIDIA GRID K260Q vs NVIDIA Quadro P400
10
NVIDIA GRID K260Q vs NVIDIA RTX A2000 12 GB
Related News
1
Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage
2
Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation
3
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
4
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
5
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
6
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
7
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
8
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
9
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
10
NVIDIA Grace CPU Benchmark Results Released, Stunning Performance
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy