Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GRID K260Q vs NVIDIA RTX A4500 Max-Q

NVIDIA GRID K260Q vs NVIDIA RTX A4500 Max-Q

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM GRID K260Q and 16GB VRAM RTX A4500 Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A4500 Max-Q 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1215MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
4352 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (80W vs 225W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GRID K260Q
2.289 TFLOPS
RTX A4500 Max Q +525%
14.31 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2013
Release Date
Mar 2022
GRID
Generation
Quadro Ampere-M
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
510 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1215 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
46
1536
Shading Units
5888
128
TMUs
184
32
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
184
-
RT Cores
46
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

23.84 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
116.6 GPixel/s
95.36 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
223.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
14.31 TFLOPS
2.289 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
14.31 TFLOPS
95.36 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
223.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

225W
TDP
80W
550 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
GA104
-
-
-
Kepler
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
8 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
17.4 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
392 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
8.6
5.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy