Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GRID K520Q vs NVIDIA Tesla P100 SXM2

NVIDIA GRID K520Q vs NVIDIA Tesla P100 SXM2

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM GRID K520Q and 16GB VRAM Tesla P100 SXM2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GRID K520Q 's Advantages
Lower TDP (225W vs 300W)
NVIDIA Tesla P100 SXM2 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1480MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (732.2GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
2048 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GRID K520Q
2.289 TFLOPS
Tesla P100 SXM2 +363%
10.61 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2014
Release Date
Apr 2016
GRID
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1328 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1480 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
715 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2
256bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
732.2GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
56
1536
Shading Units
3584
128
TMUs
224
32
ROPs
96
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
24 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

23.84 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
142.1 GPixel/s
95.36 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
331.5 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
21.22 TFLOPS
2.289 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
10.61 TFLOPS
95.36 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
5.304 TFLOPS

Board Design

225W
TDP
300W
550 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
GP100
-
GPU Variant
GP100-890-A1
Kepler
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
16 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
15.3 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
610 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
6.0
5.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy