Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GRID K540Q vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 Passive

NVIDIA GRID K540Q vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 Passive

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM GRID K540Q and 48GB VRAM Quadro RTX 8000 Passive to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GRID K540Q 's Advantages
Lower TDP (225W vs 260W)
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 Passive 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1620MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (672.0GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
3072 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GRID K540Q
2.289 TFLOPS
Quadro RTX 8000 Passive +552%
14.93 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2014
Release Date
Aug 2018
GRID
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1230 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1620 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
48GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
672.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
72
1536
Shading Units
4608
128
TMUs
288
32
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
576
-
RT Cores
72
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

23.84 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
155.5 GPixel/s
95.36 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
466.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
29.86 TFLOPS
2.289 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
14.93 TFLOPS
95.36 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
466.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

225W
TDP
260W
550 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
TU102
-
GPU Variant
TU102-875-A1
Kepler
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
18.6 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
754 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
7.5
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy