NVIDIA GRID M3 3020 vs Intel Arctic Sound M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM GRID M3 3020 and 16GB VRAM Intel Arctic Sound M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GRID M3 3020 's Advantages
Boost Clock1306MHz
Intel Arctic Sound M 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 8 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 83.20GB/s)
7552 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GRID M3 3020
1.672 TFLOPS
Intel Arctic Sound M
+782%
14.75 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
May 2016
Release Date
Jan 2022
GRID
Generation
Xe Graphics
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1033 MHz
Base Clock
-
1306 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1300 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2e
128bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
83.20GB/s
Bandwidth
1229GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
640
Shading Units
8192
40
TMUs
256
16
ROPs
128
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
8 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
20.90 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
115.2 GPixel/s
52.24 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
230.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
29.49 TFLOPS
1.672 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
14.75 TFLOPS
52.24 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
3.686 TFLOPS
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
500W
200 W
Suggested PSU
900 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS
Graphics Processor
GM107
GPU Name
DG2-512
-
-
-
Maxwell
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
6 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
21.7 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
406 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.0
CUDA
-
6.7 (5.1)
Shader Model
6.6
