Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GRID M3 3020 vs NVIDIA Quadro K5100M

NVIDIA GRID M3 3020 vs NVIDIA Quadro K5100M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM GRID M3 3020 and 8GB VRAM Quadro K5100M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GRID M3 3020 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 69% (1306MHz vs 771MHz)
NVIDIA Quadro K5100M 's Advantages
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (115.2GB/s vs 83.20GB/s)
896 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GRID M3 3020
1.672 TFLOPS
Quadro K5100M +41%
2.369 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2016
Release Date
Jul 2013
GRID
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

1033 MHz
Base Clock
771 MHz
1306 MHz
Boost Clock
771 MHz
1300 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
83.20GB/s
Bandwidth
115.2GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
-
-
640
Shading Units
1536
40
TMUs
128
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
2 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

20.90 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
24.67 GPixel/s
52.24 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
98.69 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1.672 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.369 TFLOPS
52.24 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
98.69 GFLOPS

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
100W
200 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GM107
GPU Name
GK104
-
GPU Variant
N15E-Q5-A2
Maxwell
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
5.0
CUDA
3.0
6.7 (5.1)
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy