Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GRID M60 2Q vs NVIDIA Quadro K4200

NVIDIA GRID M60 2Q vs NVIDIA Quadro K4200

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM GRID M60 2Q and 4GB VRAM Quadro K4200 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GRID M60 2Q 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 50% (1178MHz vs 784MHz)
704 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K4200 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (172.8GB/s vs 160.4GB/s)
Lower TDP (108W vs 225W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GRID M60 2Q +128%
4.825 TFLOPS
Quadro K4200
2.107 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2015
Release Date
Jul 2014
GRID
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

557 MHz
Base Clock
771 MHz
1178 MHz
Boost Clock
784 MHz
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
1350 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
160.4GB/s
Bandwidth
172.8GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
-
-
2048
Shading Units
1344
128
TMUs
112
64
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
2 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

75.39 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
21.95 GPixel/s
150.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
87.81 GTexel/s
-
-
-
4.825 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.107 TFLOPS
150.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
87.81 GFLOPS

Board Design

225W
TDP
108W
550 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GM204
GPU Name
GK104
-
GPU Variant
GK104-850-A2
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
5.2 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
398 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
5.2
CUDA
3.0
6.4
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy