Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GRID M60 4A vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition

NVIDIA GRID M60 4A vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM GRID M60 4A and 1536MB VRAM Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GRID M60 4A 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1178MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1536GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.4GB/s vs 76.80GB/s)
1856 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 225W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GRID M60 4A +944%
4.825 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition
0.462 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2015
Release Date
Nov 2008
GRID
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

557 MHz
Base Clock
-
1178 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
1536MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
160.4GB/s
Bandwidth
76.80GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
24
2048
Shading Units
192
128
TMUs
64
64
ROPs
24
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
192 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

75.39 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.45 GPixel/s
150.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
38.53 GTexel/s
-
-
-
4.825 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
462.3 GFLOPS
150.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
57.79 GFLOPS

Board Design

225W
TDP
150W
550 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GM204
GPU Name
GT200B
-
-
-
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
5.2 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
398 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.2
CUDA
1.3
6.4
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy