Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GRID M60 8Q vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI250X

NVIDIA GRID M60 8Q vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI250X

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM GRID M60 8Q and 128GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI250X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GRID M60 8Q 's Advantages
Lower TDP (225W vs 500W)
AMD Radeon Instinct MI250X 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 44% (1700MHz vs 1178MHz)
More VRAM (128GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (3277GB/s vs 160.4GB/s)
12032 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GRID M60 8Q
4.825 TFLOPS
Radeon Instinct MI250X +892%
47.87 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2015
Release Date
Nov 2021
GRID
Generation
Radeon Instinct
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

557 MHz
Base Clock
1000 MHz
1178 MHz
Boost Clock
1700 MHz
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
1600 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
128GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2e
256bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
160.4GB/s
Bandwidth
3277GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
220
-
-
-
2048
Shading Units
14080
128
TMUs
880
64
ROPs
0
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

75.39 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
150.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1496 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
383.0 TFLOPS
4.825 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
47.87 TFLOPS
150.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
47.87 TFLOPS

Board Design

225W
TDP
500W
550 W
Suggested PSU
900 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GM204
GPU Name
Aldebaran
-
GPU Variant
Aldebaran XT
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
CDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
6 nm
5.2 billion
Transistors
58.2 billion
398 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.2
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy