Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 16 vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M

NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 16 vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM GRID RTX T10 16 and 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 160M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 16 's Advantages
Boost Clock1395MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (604.8GB/s vs 11.20GB/s)
4600 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (12W vs 260W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GRID RTX T10 16 +55813%
12.86 TFLOPS
Quadro NVS 160M
0.023 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Aug 2008
GRID
Generation
NVS Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-I

Clock Speeds

1065 MHz
Base Clock
-
1395 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1575 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
64bit
604.8GB/s
Bandwidth
11.20GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
72
SM Count
1
4608
Shading Units
8
288
TMUs
4
96
ROPs
4
576
Tensor Cores
-
72
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
6 MB
L2 Cache
16 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

133.9 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.320 GPixel/s
401.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.320 GTexel/s
25.71 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.86 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
23.20 GFLOPS
401.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

260W
TDP
12W
600 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

TU102
GPU Name
G98
TU102-875-A1
GPU Variant
NB9M-GS
Turing
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
65 nm
18.6 billion
Transistors
0.21 billion
754 mm²
Die Size
86 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
1.1
6.6
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy