Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 16 vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 Passive

NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 16 vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 Passive

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM GRID RTX T10 16 and 48GB VRAM Quadro RTX 8000 Passive to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 Passive 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 16% (1620MHz vs 1395MHz)
More VRAM (48GB vs 16GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (672.0GB/s vs 604.8GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GRID RTX T10 16
12.86 TFLOPS
Quadro RTX 8000 Passive +16%
14.93 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Aug 2018
GRID
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1065 MHz
Base Clock
1230 MHz
1395 MHz
Boost Clock
1620 MHz
1575 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
48GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
384bit
604.8GB/s
Bandwidth
672.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
72
SM Count
72
4608
Shading Units
4608
288
TMUs
288
96
ROPs
96
576
Tensor Cores
576
72
RT Cores
72
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
6 MB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

133.9 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
155.5 GPixel/s
401.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
466.6 GTexel/s
25.71 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
29.86 TFLOPS
12.86 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
14.93 TFLOPS
401.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
466.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

260W
TDP
260W
600 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

TU102
GPU Name
TU102
TU102-875-A1
GPU Variant
TU102-875-A1
Turing
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
12 nm
18.6 billion
Transistors
18.6 billion
754 mm²
Die Size
754 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
7.5
CUDA
7.5
6.6
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy